top of page
HyperTest_edited.png
see how it works

Postman Users Deal with 🤯

Continuous Maintenance

Unknown Test Coverage

Poor Quality Tests

Test Data Management

But with HyperTest,  achieve high-quality backend tests that reach over 90% code coverage in hours, not months
  • Every time your code changes, you’re stuck updating all those hand-written tests. It’s a hassle

  • Writing tests manually can mean missing out on crucial business rules and edge cases. Plus there is no way to measure coverage of Postman tests.

  • Prepping scripts, automating workflows, and seeding test data? It all eats up your time.

  • You need all your services up and running, which isn’t always possible.

With Postman

  • HyperTest generates end-to-end API tests, so you're not stuck writing them manually.

  • Unlike Postman, where you need to manually write validations on responses, HyperTest produces schema and data assertions programmatically never missing a failure.

  • Tests end to end workflows without needing to seed and manage test data.

  • While Postman requires external systems to be up and running, HyperTest allows you to run tests locally without needing dedicated environments. No Postman runners or Newman CLI needed.

With HyperTest

Don’t take our word for it
see what Postman users are saying

Postman Users on Reddit
Postman Users on Reddit
Postman Users on Reddit

Why team should choose Postman , HyperTest

Complete Backend Testing

Test APIs, database calls, message queues and inter-service contracts

100% autonomous

Generate high quality integrations tests without writing a single line of test code

Easier to set-up and Use

10-line SDK that records tests from application traffic and runs at every PR

Watch the actual Demo of banking app test comparison between Postman & HyperTest

bottom of page